CPU performance
How clock speed, cache size and the number of cores affect the performance of a CPU, individually and in combination.
Learning Objectives
- 1Describe how clock speed affects CPU performance
- 2Describe how cache size affects CPU performance
- 3Describe how the number of cores affects CPU performance
- 4Explain how changing these characteristics, individually or in combination, affects system performance
Clock speed
Think of it like...
Clock speed is like how fast a worker completes tasks. A faster worker gets through more tasks in the same hour.
Cache size
Think of it like...
Cache is like keeping the tools you use most on your desk, instead of walking to the cupboard every single time you need one.
Number of cores
Think of it like...
One core is one chef in the kitchen. Four cores is four chefs, they can cook four dishes at once, as long as there are enough separate dishes to prepare.
Putting the factors together
Exam Phrasing: Use These Exact Phrases
- ✓Clock speed is measured in hertz and determines how many instructions can be processed per second
- ✓A higher clock speed means more instructions can be processed each second
- ✓A larger cache means the CPU needs to fetch data from RAM less often
- ✓Multiple cores allow instructions to be processed in parallel
- ✓The characteristics affect performance both individually and in combination
- 💡If asked how to improve CPU performance, mention more than one factor: clock speed, cache size and number of cores.
- 💡Don't just state a factor: explain the effect. E.g. "a larger cache means fewer slow fetches from RAM, so the CPU waits less".
- 💡Remember more cores only give their full benefit if the software is able to use them.
- 💡Clock speed is measured in hertz (Hz), and in gigahertz (GHz) for modern CPUs.
Wrong:
More GHz always means a faster computer
Right:
Clock speed is one factor; cache size and number of cores also affect performance
Why it matters: Examiners want you to show that performance depends on several factors, not just clock speed.
Wrong:
More cores always doubles or triples the speed
Right:
More cores allow parallel processing, but the benefit depends on the software being able to use them
Why it matters: Overstating the effect of adding cores is a common error.
Wrong:
Cache is the same as RAM
Right:
Cache is smaller and much faster than RAM, and sits inside or very close to the CPU
Why it matters: Confusing cache with main memory loses marks.
Question:
A laptop runs slowly when several programs are open at once. Explain how increasing the number of cores could improve its performance. [3]
💡 Attempt this before revealing the answer, practice makes perfect!
Model Answer:
Each core can carry out the fetch-execute cycle independently, so a CPU with more cores can process more than one instruction at the same time, in parallel. With several programs open, the work can be shared across the cores, so more instructions are completed in a given time and the laptop feels faster. This benefit is greatest when the software is able to make use of multiple cores.
Mark Scheme:
- 1Each core can process instructions independently / in parallel
- 2More instructions can be completed in a given time (improving multitasking)
- 3The benefit depends on the software being able to use multiple cores
Tap a card to flip it. Use the arrow keys to move and space to flip.
Exam-style questions. Have a go, then reveal the mark scheme to check your answer.
1.State what is meant by the clock speed of a CPU.
[1]2.Explain how increasing the size of the cache can improve the performance of a CPU.
[3]3.A CPU has four cores. Explain how having multiple cores can improve performance.
[3]4.Two computers have CPUs with the same clock speed. Explain how one computer could still perform better than the other.
[4]5.A computer is being upgraded. Explain how increasing both the clock speed and the cache size could improve its performance.
[4]6.Two laptops cost the same. Laptop A has a 3.6 GHz dual-core CPU with 2 MB of cache. Laptop B has a 2.4 GHz quad-core CPU with 8 MB of cache. Discuss which laptop is likely to be better for video editing.
[8]Extended response · marked in levels, not by counting points
The examiners' reports are the most useful and least read of the three: they say what candidates actually got wrong each year. All files are hosted by OCR.
Past-paper questions grouped by topic
The same OCR questions, sorted by topic rather than by year (via Physics & Maths Tutor).
Examiners noted that answers about CPU characteristics were often too vague. Writing "clock" or "core" instead of "clock speed" and "number of cores" was considered too ambiguous to earn the mark, so always name the full characteristic precisely.